DÆRICK GRÖSS

LinkedIn Profile
daerickgross@gmail.com


PROJECT TOOLS USED
  • Jira
    • Epics to break out work themes
    • Structure Boards to review/manage the work
    • Dashboards to monitor burndown/completion across teams
  • Confluence
    • Team Sprint Projections
    • Project Documentation
    • Standard Rubicon Status and Project Reporting
  • Smartsheet
    • Team/Task Tracking

PROJECT REFERENCES

References related to this project available upon request

PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY | EXAMPLES | WORK EXPERIENCE | CREATIVE

DISTRESSED PROJECT FIREFIGHTING EXAMPLE

RUBICON FINANCIAL PIPELINE MIGRATION | 2017


Program Brief

  • Situation
    • In 2017, Rubicon Project set out to build a new, scalable financial pipeline and migrate the business operations from the current, older pipeline over to the new one without losing a single dollar in the process
    • Initially run as an effort outside of the Project Management org, the project found itself astray and out of alignment with executive expectations and oversight
    • I was brought in to course-correct, bring project rigor, and regain executive trust
  • Task
    • Assess the current state of the project; delivery status, communication process, alignment with leadership
    • Identify what was out of sync and why, make immediate corrections
    • Determine realistic delivery timeline and get the project back on track
    • Validate and prove with data that the delivered system has no monetary or data discrepancy when compared against the current system (within a threshold of five 9s: 99.999% parity)
  • Actions
    • Met with the previous leadership team to understand their process and status update
    • Met with the full team to review the overall project plan and ability to deliver, timeline agnostic
    • Reassessed with delivery teams their anticipated timing based on optimal conditions
    • Built a new project plan, accounting for known gaps in the new pipeline's architecture and reasonably buffering to allow some flex for delivery teams
    • Created a new reporting process and cadence mixing both written statuses and verbal presentations, allowing for clear and transparent review by executive leadership
    • Presented a revised timeline to reset stakeholder expectations, adjusted by one month from the original project plan
  • Result
    • We delivered the new financial pipeline and began the migration process on time
    • We proved the new pipeline was accurate within the stated threshold, the company could trust the numbers being reported and could move the company's official accounting over
To validate accuracy, we ran the old and new pipelines in parallel, relying on the old pipeline for three months while comparing the data with the new pipeline. At the three-month mark, we flipped over to the new financial pipeline as the primary system of record while the old system was left up and running as a safety measure for data comparison. After six months, we retired the legacy system.

Business Impact

  • This project was the lifeblood of the company and had no room for error
    • Every invoice generated, every dollar tracked by Finance was based on the numbers reported by this pipeline
  • At the end of the six-month trial period we had successfully delivered a new, reliable, scalable financial pipeline for the company
  • I hesitate to state even ballpark dollar amounts as this was representative of the company's entire financial reporting. Rather, this effort was responsible for 100% of the company's finanical health and had the attention of the entire corporate leadership team

Approach

  • Create a blameless environment, tensions were high around this effort
  • Understand the concerns of executives and stakeholders, learn what was driving the anxiety and tension
  • Understand the story from the project team on how we got to the current state, see where the gaps in expectation were
  • Rebuild from scratch, learning the lessons of the first iteration

Communication and Reporting

  • Established regular published reports per PMO standard
  • Set up intermittent in-person status presentations for leadership's review

Challenges

  • The project plan as inherited was incomplete, there were archetectural and validation gaps still to account for
  • Tensions were high and trust was low, specifically from executive leadership given the sensitivity and implication to the company of this effort

Key Learnings

  • Recognition that not everyone has the project management acumen that professional PjMs have
  • Understanding that project failures and shortcomings don't come from malice or negligence; everyone wants to succeed and do a good job